We assessed the accuracy of different under-roost sampling designs using generalized additive models and field data from individually captured bats and pooled urine samples. Here, we explore the general issue of bias in spatial sample pooling using Hendra virus in Australian bats as a case study. However, positive bias is introduced because multiple individuals may contribute to pooled samples, making studies of viral dynamics difficult. Field sampling methods often collect pooled samples of bat excreta from plastic sheets placed under-roosts. Outbreaks of infectious viruses resulting from spillover events from bats have brought much attention to bat-borne zoonoses, which has motivated increased ecological and epidemiological studies on bat populations.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |